This week, President Biden had his first official press briefing since his administration came into office. I thought I would compare and contrast it to the average Trump press briefing. During the conference, the president talked about his new goals for Covid vaccinations, the economic stimulus bill that was passed, and answered questions regarding immigration and border control, voting rights, climate change, and the occupation of troops in Afghanistan. He was also asked about his promised bipartisanship with Mitch McConnell. While speaking about these issues, Biden did not call anyone names. Trump would often question the intelligence of the reporters (mainly the female ones) when he was asked a difficult question or one he felt was 'threatening' to him. Biden did not make any grand promises that he knew he couldn't keep but was reassuring that the issues would be handled with care, compassion, and to the best of the administration's abilities. Trump would often ...
I don't know of a politician who isn't guilty of occasionally spinning a story to put themselves in a better light to the general public. We just lived through 4 years of a man doing this every single week he was in office. And while I do believe the Biden administration has been much more up-front with the American people thus far, a story I saw circulating this week really caught my eye and in my opinion, is a great example of framing the message. President Biden ordered an airstrike in Syria on an Iranian-backed military base on February 26th, which was all over the news, of course - a decision that was received with praise as well as backlash. However, the story this week paints the ordeal in a different light. Sure, the first airstrike occurred, but there was going to be a second. Biden reportedly halted the second airstrike because he got word that a woman and some children were out in the courtyard of the base. What a great guy, what a humanitarian who cares about civ...
A couple of weeks ago, the governor of West Virginia announced details on a program that would pay remote workers $12,000 if they moved there. The requirement is that you have a remote position at a job outside of the state. In the campaign for this program, they advertise West Virginia as a pristine, adventurous outdoorsy state just waiting for you to enjoy. I find this problematic in many ways. First of all, West Virginia is the poorest state in the country. You cannot just move people who already have jobs into your state to fix your state...it will only raise housing costs of the people who already live there. How about investing in good-paying jobs to lift your constituents out of poverty? There is a reason people do not move there: https://www.wvpublic.org/news/2019-09-24/study-finds-west-virginia-counties-among-worst-in-nation-for-drinking-water-violations http://www.catf.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/CATF_FactSheet_HealthEffects_WV.pdf https://www.bbc.com/news/world-...
Comments
Post a Comment